<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul at Wizbang Blog deleted my comment; can you trust what you read there?</title>
	<link>http://katrinacoverage.com/2005/12/20/paul-at-wizbang-blog-deleted-my-comment-can-you-trust-what-you-read-there.html</link>
	<description>Analyzing the news reports and politics of the New Orleans hurricane.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Paul at Wizbang Blog deleted my comment; can you trust what you read there? by: Katrina Coverage Paul at Wizbang Blog deleted my comment; can you trust what you read there?</title>
		<link>http://katrinacoverage.com/2005/12/20/paul-at-wizbang-blog-deleted-my-comment-can-you-trust-what-you-read-there.html#comment-116</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://katrinacoverage.com/2005/12/20/paul-at-wizbang-blog-deleted-my-comment-can-you-trust-what-you-read-there.html#comment-116</guid>
					<description>[...] Since I&amp;#8217;m familiar with how this works from watching the hack-o-sphere&amp;#8217;s reaction to al Qaqaa and Rathergate, I decided to go to the &amp;#8220;orinsf&amp;#8221; site and offer the following contrary information (I adjusted the links because &amp;#8220;orinsf&amp;#8221; doesn&amp;#8217;t allow HTML comments): Well&amp;#8230; given the large number of supposed tall tales (three separate examples), I&amp;#8217;d be a bit surprised to find out that most of them were false. In fact, downplaying all those accounts would seem to be in (almost) everyone&amp;#8217;s best interest, no? Of course, it&amp;#8217;s best to keep an open mind and investigate each alleged incident rather than fit preliminary information to one&amp;#8217;s agenda. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] Since I'm familiar with how this works from watching the hack-o-sphere's reaction to al Qaqaa and Rathergate, I decided to go to the "orinsf" site and offer the following contrary information (I adjusted the links because "orinsf" doesn't allow HTML comments): Well&#8230; given the large number of supposed tall tales (three separate examples), I'd be a bit surprised to find out that most of them were false. In fact, downplaying all those accounts would seem to be in (almost) everyone's best interest, no? Of course, it's best to keep an open mind and investigate each alleged incident rather than fit preliminary information to one's agenda. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
